TrustDice vs BC.Game: an active licence against a revoked record

Brand	Licence authority	Coins read	Document round	Ceiling in the terms	Link
TrustDice	Curaçao Gaming Authority	9	not read	not read
Wild.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	12	no figure published	100,000 USD per week cl. 9.6
Bitcasino.io	Curaçao Gaming Authority	not read	2,500 EUR	1,000,000 USDT per week cl. 6.10
Cloudbet	Curaçao Gaming Authority	40	no figure published	not read
DuckDice	Anjouan Gaming Board	10	no figure published	not read
Empire.io	Anjouan Gaming Board	not read	2,000 USDT	not read
Rainbet	Anjouan Gaming Board	9	no figure published	not published
Rocketpot	Curacao	13	US$2,500	5,000 USD per month cl. 11.5
Vavepaid	Curaçao Gaming Authority	6	no figure published	from 50,000 USDT in instalments cl. 8.8	Open

Side by side, in one table

The short answer. On the register, TrustDice. Its Curaçao licence was Active when we read it on 26 August 2026, and it has a second record in Anjouan; the BC.Game record we read on the same day was marked Revoked. In the lobby the two are close, so if BC.Game's games are what you like, the question to settle first is which licence it is operating under today — and if you would rather not settle it, the casinos further down this page hold active records.

The licence difference

BC.Game: Curaçao Gaming Authority record OGL/2023/118/0060, held by Small House B.V., company number 164979, issued on 4 March 2024, and marked Revoked when we read the certificate portal on 26 August 2026.

TrustDice: Curaçao Gaming Authority licence OGL/2024/664/0280, held by Satoshi Gaming Group N.V., company number 151832, issued on 16 July 2024 and Active on the same day; plus an Anjouan record, ALSI-202605020-FI1, held by Satoshi Labs Ltd and valid to 14 May 2027.

A revoked record means that number no longer stands for a live licence, so it cannot be the reason to trust the site that prints it. BC.Game may hold a different licence now; if it does, it is not the record we read, and the only way to know is to take the number from its footer today and type it into the register yourself. That is the one step in any TrustDice vs BC.Game decision that takes two minutes and matters more than everything below it.

Documents and KYC

We have not read BC.Game's verification wording, so on documents this page can only give you one side. That side is our own: when we played TrustDice with our own money in May 2026, crypto withdrawals went out in ten to fifteen minutes each with no verification until the running total reached about 5,000 USDT. Then the next withdrawal went under review, a Veriff check followed, and TrustDice asked for the same documents again by email. The account was played over a VPN, and TrustDice never blocked it for that. The full sequence is in the TrustDice review.

Games and the lobby

This is where TrustDice and BC.Game are closest. Both run their own games — BC.Game its originals, TrustDice its dice and originals — both have a sportsbook in the same account, and both have live dealers; BC.Game adds provably fair games and runs a crypto-only cashier. TrustDice takes nine coins, including its own TXT token, and lists 43 game studios; we hold no coin list or studio count for BC.Game, so the lobbies are compared here by kind rather than by size.

If the licence is the deciding point

Every casino below held an Active Curaçao record when we read the register on 26 August 2026 (Vave's was re-read on 2 September): Vave, Wild.io, Cloudbet and Bitcasino.io. Vave is our advertiser, and the one of the four we have put our own money through: no ID was requested up to 5,000 USDT. Wild.io is the closest to TrustDice and BC.Game in the lobby, with its own originals, a sportsbook and provably fair games. All eight are compared on the TrustDice alternatives listing.

VaveGet a 150% bonus on your first deposit, from 20 USDT up to 200,000 USDT, at the casino most like TrustDice

6Coins read

Open

More head-to-heads: TrustDice vs Stake, TrustDice vs Vave and TrustDice vs Mega Dice.